In October, the UK government introduced a sweeping set of tax increases to address budgetary shortfalls and maintain essential public services. With inflation seemingly under control but public debt increasing, the budget focused on raising revenue through traditional methods, and we saw various tweaks across income tax, corporation tax, and VAT on private school fees. However, there were more significant changes elsewhere, with an increase in national insurance and IHT consequences for unused pension assets from 2027.
While the rationale was understandable, it has left some analysts questioning if the timing and extent of these changes were fully considered in light of global economic pressures.
One of the most prominent issues looming over the UK economy is the potential imposition of trade tariffs by the United States. Incoming US President Donald Trump publicly stated that should he regain office, he would reconsider trade terms (increased tariffs) with several countries, including the UK. The impact of tariffs on UK goods, especially from a major trading partner like the US, could further pressure industries that are already absorbing costs due to higher taxes.
If implemented, these tariffs could lead to reduced exports, job losses, and, ultimately, slower economic growth, directly affecting British businesses and consumers already coping with tighter margins. Economists note that these risks are not mere hypotheticals—they reflect growing tensions in global trade dynamics that the UK must be prepared to face head-on.
The budget changes were part of a strategy aimed at stabilising the economy, but it may have inadvertently left the country more exposed to unanticipated economic shocks. The structure of the tax hikes, aimed largely at middle-income earners and businesses, means that disposable income levels are expected to shrink across significant segments of the population. When a country’s domestic spending power declines, it has less capacity to absorb sudden shocks, such as supply chain disruptions, unexpected shifts in foreign policy, or new trade barriers.
Broadly higher taxes on corporations, too, may discourage foreign direct investment, a key driver of innovation and job creation in the UK. With global investors potentially looking elsewhere, the UK risks becoming a less attractive market at a time when economic resilience is paramount.
With Brexit creating a new set of trade boundaries, the UK’s economy has been in a transition phase, adjusting to a more independent trading framework. Now, with additional pressure from tax hikes, some experts worry that the UK may not be equipped to handle further strain from external economic shocks. If the US were to impose tariffs, the UK would likely see an immediate impact on specific sectors, especially manufacturing, technology, and agriculture, which have longstanding trade ties with the US.
Moreover, recent economic indicators show that the UK’s growth is modest at best, with consumer confidence and business investment both facing significant headwinds. These factors create a precarious environment where any external shock could have a magnified impact, compounding the challenges of high taxation and low growth.
There is a growing consensus that the UK needs to build economic resilience to buffer the economy against future shocks. This includes diversifying trade relationships to reduce dependency on any single market, encouraging domestic investment to fuel innovation, and creating policies that support middle-income earners and businesses. Measures to promote green energy and technology could also help mitigate economic dependence on fluctuating global markets.
In the face of unpredictable global developments, a balanced approach that leverages both taxation and incentives could support a more resilient economy. With a more diversified approach, the UK could be better positioned to navigate economic challenges, ensuring that its economy is adaptable to rapid changes in the international landscape.
The UK’s current predicament serves as a cautionary tale about the need for adaptive economic planning. While it may be tempting to shore up the economy through immediate tax increases, these measures should ideally be complemented by strategies that address potential vulnerabilities. By preparing for the unexpected, the UK can better safeguard its economic future, creating a buffer that ensures stability amid global uncertainties.
As the effects of the October budget continue to unfold, the importance of strategic foresight becomes ever clearer. Economic resilience is not a luxury—it’s a necessity. For the UK to thrive in an increasingly interconnected world, proactive and multifaceted approaches to economic planning will be essential. But will they be forthcoming?
Back to News