17 April 2024
Few expected such a brutally honest assessment when the Bank of England asked former US Federal Reserve leader Ben Bernanke to assess the bank’s economic modelling. While many historical criticisms targeted at the Bank of England were covered, the report was less comprehensive than some had hoped. However, where comments were made, they were direct, to the point and, in some cases, highly critical of the current situation.
Many people may not be aware, but the Bank of England's inflation-targeting approach to monetary policy has been in place since 1997 when Tony Blair was in power. Everyone knows the situation has changed since the 2008 global financial crisis, which prompted many central banks to cast a different eye on their forecasts. The Bank of England seems to be behind the curve, which was demonstrated when a recent delay in recognising inflationary pressures saw it peak at 11.1% - higher than the US and the Eurozone.
Considering the size, influence, and reputation of the Bank of England, it was surprising to see Ben Bernanke criticising levels of investment. He especially mentioned forecasting tools, suggesting that makeshift fixes had created overly complex systems that failed to use new cutting-edge technology and instead took up excessive staff hours.
The main model was described as having "significant shortcomings", failing to pay relevant attention to labour market and productivity problems and the interactions between wages and prices. While the 2008 crisis was a once-in-a-generation event, the inefficiency of the Bank of England's forecasting tools caused it to switch to human judgment during those difficult times.
The former leader of the Federal Reserve was particularly scathing about the MPC's unwillingness to publish alternative scenarios to the central Bank of England monetary policy. He was also less than impressed that the Bank of England refused to publish the personal views of MPC members on interest rates. Unfortunately, in his 75-page report, Ben Bernanke declined to recommend this switch in market communication, but it is undoubtedly on the table.
There was also a significant focus on the fact that the Bank of England bases its central forecast on market expectations rather than the bank's expectations. Ironically, if market rates are too high, this will prompt a different forecast, potentially in direct conflict with the Bank of England's own interest rate expectations. Confused?
If we strip aside the arguments and counterarguments, we are left with one major issue: a perceived lack of transparency. Ben Bernanke believes that the Bank of England should publish regular market reviews, not just when the MPC meets, thereby providing ongoing in-depth guidance for the markets. Interestingly, while highly critical of some areas of the Bank of England's operations, Ben Bernanke admitted that decisions made during challenging financial times were no worse than those of the majority of central banks and independent analysts.
If the Bank of England were to start publishing its own projections for rates and long-term strategies, this would put the UK in line with the likes of the US, Sweden, Norway, South Africa, and New Zealand. It may also help to build bridges with economists and experts who, despite decades of experience, found some of the Bank of England's updates in challenging times contradictory and, in some cases, potentially misleading.
As with all forms of monetary policy, there are pros and cons to the Bank of England's current approach and that proposed by Ben Bernanke. One of the main issues going forward is transparency, as well as using the skills and experience of those on the MPC committee to help better guide markets. The fact that the Bank of England is even considering change, is progress; whether it will happen is a whole different story.
Back to News
+44 (0)20 7048 9400
Email Us
Client login
