07 May 2025
In 2025, a three-day outage at Barclays served as a stark reminder of how dependent financial institutions have become on complex, fragile systems. The failure, which was traced back to legacy infrastructure, left millions unable to access basic services and cost the bank millions in compensation. Similar disruptions have become increasingly common across the sector, underscoring a deepening vulnerability at the heart of digital finance.
While banks have aggressively pursued digital transformation, the demand for speed and automation - primarily driven by consumer expectations - is outpacing their ability to secure and stabilise the systems that support it.
As financial services evolve to match the convenience and speed of social media and e-commerce platforms, banks have scaled their technology stacks to deliver faster, more personalised, and more accessible products. Mobile apps now function as a 24/7 financial hub with real-time payments, biometric authentication, and AI-driven insights all standard.
However, the pressure to rapidly deliver new features has driven many institutions to build on top of older, less agile systems. Beneath the surface of slick user interfaces, legacy code and brittle integrations often hold these digital platforms together. This technical debt, the accumulation of outdated or inefficient system design, has become one of the industry’s greatest liabilities.
This fragility isn’t hypothetical. Recent operational failures have revealed how simple interface issues, overlooked testing scenarios, or supplier errors can escalate into major service outages. The complexity of modern banking - from trading platforms to fraud detection to customer service - means a single fault can cascade across multiple business lines.
As institutions add more layers of automation and digital capability, they create increasingly complex interdependencies. These can make systems more efficient but also more opaque and harder to manage. Many incidents stem not from malicious attacks but from configuration errors, misrouted transactions, or breakdowns in third-party services.
Banks are outsourcing more of their infrastructure to cloud service providers to support innovation at scale. The benefits are compelling: flexible computing power, global reach, and the ability to update and patch systems in real-time.
However, this shift also introduces a new set of risks. Hybrid IT environments - blending legacy on-premises systems with cloud platforms and mobile applications - increase the complexity of oversight. Responsibility becomes shared between banks and vendors, which can lead to confusion over who is accountable in moments of crisis.
When financial systems rely on multiple cloud providers, API layers, and outsourced developers, incident response becomes more difficult. Inconsistencies in monitoring, security standards, or compliance obligations between third parties can delay containment and recovery when something goes wrong.
Many institutions are now looking to automation and artificial intelligence to reduce manual processes and improve resilience. These technologies can strengthen detection, improve response times, and predict problems before they escalate.
However, automation can also accelerate failure if not properly governed. AI systems can introduce new vulnerabilities, especially when poorly tested or deployed without strong oversight. From biased algorithms to adversarial manipulation, AI adds a layer of risk that traditional compliance frameworks are still adapting to.
Furthermore, as AI becomes embedded in more core financial infrastructure, it becomes a more attractive target for cyber attackers and a more fragile point of failure.
The pressure to innovate is not going away. Consumers expect intuitive, seamless digital banking and institutions must continue to modernise to remain competitive. But this cannot come at the cost of reliability and trust.
The path forward requires a renewed focus on foundational IT hygiene: rigorous testing, stronger internal controls, effective vendor oversight, and investment in system redundancy. Governance models must evolve alongside technology, not lag behind it.
In the race to automate, financial services firms must balance ambition with caution. Because in a world of instant access and invisible infrastructure, a single point of failure can bring an entire institution - or market - to a standstill.
Back to News
+44 (0)20 7048 9400
Email Us
Client login
